Ihtijaj (Argumentation) [Abu Mansur Ahmad Tabarsi, Saiyyed Amir Husayn Sarkishian] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In the introduction. Al–Ihtijaj by Allama Abu Mansur Ahmad Tibrisi Vol Uploaded by Syed Naqvi. Islamic Urdu Book. Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC). Download. Al-Tabarsi and the Distortion of the Qur’an. Al-Tabarsi mentions in his book al- Ihtijaj (vol. 1 pg. ) while discussing the argument of Amir al-Mu’minin `Ali radiya Llahu `anhu.

Author: Goltihn Vudotaxe
Country: Paraguay
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 6 November 2006
Pages: 416
PDF File Size: 20.7 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.20 Mb
ISBN: 353-5-86928-403-8
Downloads: 49088
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nikotaxe

Ihyijaj shouldn’t be expecting a Salafi-Militant ideology amongst us, where we are just waiting for a slight opportunity to start passing takfir on someone. Then he plotted that Khalid ibn al-Walid should kill him, but he failed to do so. That would be an extremely fallacious move to discredit someone’s personality or all of their other works based on one work – without having read the other works or not knowing about their general methodology.

Shaykh Tabarsi – Wikipedia

If Tabarsi as you claim only believed that something been dropped from Quran, he believed in such type of alteration tahrif. Posted October 13, edited. He wrote in refutation of “Faslul Khitab” of our shaykh an-Noori.

O you who have believed, ask Allah to confer blessing upon him and ask Allah to grant him peace. The fact of the matter is that the great level of reliability that the author holds has cultivated in the hearts of the later authors reliance upon the book and quoting from the book without investigating thoroughly the asanid of each hadith. As examples, we can mention a few of the works from which he derived the hadith s in the present collection, works which have been independently published in modern times.

Translator’s Introduction

Would would be his status in shia world? I have already quoted Noori introduction to his book, in the beginning of this thread. So if Tabarsi, like tqbarsi said simply believed that some verses or even part of the verses been missing from Quran, this again would be called that he did believe in change, tampering, alteration of Quran.

What do you know about shaykh Noori Intijaj And why is just an absence of a verse an issue? Peace upon the family of Yasin [10]. Peter Lamborn Wilson and William Shpall also read the manuscript and made valuable suggestions. It was compiled in the Safavid period by the famous theologian Muhammad Baqir Majlisi d. Because no proofs for this available.


If someone would say that hz Ali use to drink wine, and tabwrsi bring efforts to prove this. It is said that he was regretful over the name he had given to his book, because many people were assuming simply by the title, that he held the belief that the Qur’an was altered through addition and by changes in actual verses, like previous Divine books had.

The book is researched by Muhammad Baqir Musawi Khirsan. I will assume you mean that people reject their divine appointment as an Imam. Allah did this since He knew what those men would do to his Book, such as removing the names of his proofs ie ImamsHe knew how they’d conceal these matters from the nation and turn the people to their own side, so they may aid them in their evil.

Similarly the following verse: Yes it been tampered. It includes prayers to be recited daily, prayers for special occasions such as religious holidays and days of mourning, litanies and invocations for different moments in one’s life, instructions for making a pilgrimage to the tomb of the Prophet or any one of the Imams and prayers for every other conceivable occasion as well. As ‘Allamah Tabataba’i points out in his foreword, in making these selections his aim was to emphasize the three basic dimensions of the Shi’ite tradition:.

Taqiyyah is also needed in breaking this clear knowledge which is firm within the hearts of the one who disagrees and the one who agrees of following fabarsi obeying them as well as being pleased with them, the other reason also is that; these people of corruption in the past [16] and present time [17] are more than the people of truth.

All he believed was that some verses are missing like if someone believed the Imams or the Prophet could forget at times. Go To Topic Listing. The work contains such things as descriptions of the Imam’s mother, explanations of the reason his name was chosen, all the sayings which have been recorded from him, and traditions ihtijai his death and the miracles which have occurred at his tomb. Under the chapter title: Al-Bahrani mentions in al-Kashkul vol.


Therefore He resorted to these inferences and made their hearts and eyes blind to them, because of the negligence they would perpetrate and so forth. I don’t want to discuss it here, and I ask you do not ruin this thread with copy pastes not related to discussed topic. The book has no value in Shi’i scholarly circles, so I’m not even sure why the Sunnis keep bringing tabaarsi up.

These all result in change of meaning, no matter how trivial you may tbarsi it may be. These are two different topics so please don’t mix things up. So the happy ones observe them and recognize them the arguments whereas the evil ones do not pay attention, and the ones whom Allah grants no tbarsi, they have no light. Please don’t start words games with me.

What is going to be reaction of any average shia, if any scholar will write a book to proof deficiency of Ahlalbayt?

The apparent meaning is: The problem is how you have constrained the meaning and implication of the word tahreef to something specific. For you to come and tell me not to play word games shows your lack of inexperience and ignorance. The book contains the arguments presented by the Prophet s and the infallible Imams a and some of their followers against their opponents form various sects and religions. And in volume 10 of his book “adh-Dhariyah”, pageTahrani spoke about this answer of Noori.

The book have been translated several times into Persian. Are you asking my personal opinion? Seems like you didn’t read my 4th post on this thread, where I quoted: June 25, Don’t you agree that the absence of a word from the Quran could change the meaning of a verse?

How dare you lie so openly?